Comparison

RE:Writeoff vs Stessa

Stessa is the biggest name in rental property accounting software, now owned by Roofstock. It tracks income, expenses, and helps with tax prep. RE:Writeoff does something completely different: it tracks your property management hours for REPS qualification and STR tax deductions. These tools are more complementary than competitive, and many investors will benefit from using both.

Different tools for different problems

This is an important distinction: Stessa tracks your money (income and expenses). RE:Writeoff tracks your time (property management hours). Both matter for taxes, but they solve different problems.

Stessa answers:

  • “How much rental income did I earn?”
  • “What expenses can I deduct?”
  • “What does my Schedule E look like?”

RE:Writeoff answers:

  • “Am I hitting 750 hours for REPS?”
  • “What property management activities did I do?”
  • “Can I prove my hours in an audit?”

Quick facts

RE:Writeoff

  • Free tier + Pro at $9/mo
  • 30-day free trial, no credit card
  • Hour tracking, AI classification, evidence linking
  • Email auto-scan for activity detection

Stessa

  • Free tier (generous), Stessa Pro available
  • Income/expense tracking, dashboards
  • Tax prep, lease drafting, tenant screening
  • Owned by Roofstock

Feature comparison

FeatureRE:WriteoffStessa
Hour trackingYes (core feature)No
REPS documentationYes (750-hour tracking)No
Email auto-scanYesNo
AI activity classificationYesNo
Evidence linkingYesNo
Income/expense trackingNoYes (core feature)
Property dashboardsNoYes
Tenant screeningNoYes
Rent collectionNoYes
Schedule E tax prepNoYes
Audit-ready hour reportsYesNo
Free tierYesYes (generous)

Where Stessa wins

Stessa is excellent at what it does, and it does a lot:

  • Free accounting. Stessa's free tier is remarkably generous for property accounting. Income tracking, expense categorization, and financial dashboards at no cost.
  • Bigger company. Owned by Roofstock, Stessa has significant backing and resources. It's a mature, well-funded platform.
  • Full landlording suite. Lease drafting, tenant screening, rent collection, and Schedule E tax preparation. Stessa covers the financial side of landlording end-to-end.
  • Property dashboards. Visual dashboards showing cash flow, net operating income, and portfolio performance across all your properties.

Where RE:Writeoff wins

RE:Writeoff solves the problem Stessa doesn't touch:

  • Hour tracking. Stessa has no hour tracking at all. If you need to document 750+ hours for REPS or 100+ hours for STR deductions, Stessa can't help.
  • Activity documentation. RE:Writeoff creates a contemporaneous log of property management activities, the kind the IRS requires for REPS claims.
  • Email scanning. Automatically finds property management activities in your email, something neither Stessa nor any other property accounting tool offers.
  • Audit evidence. Every activity links to source documentation. If the IRS questions your hours, you have the receipts.

The real answer: use both

Stessa and RE:Writeoff aren't really competitors. They solve different problems for the same person. A serious real estate investor needs to track both money and time:

  • Stessa for income, expenses, and financial reporting
  • RE:Writeoff for hour tracking, REPS documentation, and audit-ready activity logs

Together, they give you complete tax documentation: the financial records Stessa provides plus the hour-by-hour activity log RE:Writeoff creates. Your CPA will thank you.

This comparison is based on publicly available information as of April 2026. Competitor pricing and features may change. RE:Writeoff provides activity tracking tools, not tax advice. Consult a qualified tax professional before making decisions based on this information.

Try RE:Writeoff free

Already using Stessa for accounting? Add RE:Writeoff for the hour tracking side. 30-day free trial, no credit card required.

Start free trial
RE:Writeoff vs Stessa — Rental Property Tool Comparison | RE:Writeoff — REPS Tax Savings | RE:Writeoff — REPS Tax Savings